Manager: Mr.Mbu, I would not describe you as an inefficient worker; I therefore find it difficult to understand why the conference room is so untidy, in spite of the fact that I had reminded you of the meeting scheduled to take place there this afternoon. Secretary: Sir, I did instruct the cleaner to tidy up the place before meeting Manager: Are you trying to hold the cleaner responsible for the untidy condition of the room? Secretary: Partly, sir, I gave him an instruction which he failed to carry out. It is certainly my intention to make a formal complaint against him for dereliction of duty. Manager: And would you wash your hands off any blame after that? Do you think that just making a formal complaint against the cleaner absolves you of all blame? When do you consider an assignment as properly executed; when the execution is properly supervised or not? Was it sufficient for you to give instruction to the cleaner with out ensuring that he actually carried them out? Secretary: Sir, I do not see what else I could have done, short of doing the job myself. The cleaner Is a six-footer and I could not have intimidated him physically. Manager: I see, I await your complaints against the cleaner, but I shall not forget that you allowed a board meeting to take place in an untidy conference room.
The secretary's attitude seems to be
A. manager sir, you empolyed this huge and recalcitrant cleaner and i am not to do his job for him B. it is not the duty of a secretary to enforce the instruction he gives to his junior workers C. i am a secretary by profession not a cleaner D. it is not terribly important how tidy the conference room is for the meeting
